Skip to main content

History of India - The coming of the Europeans

European colonies in India were set up by several European nations beginning at the beginning of the 16th century. Rivalry between reigning European powers saw the entry of the Portuguese, Dutch, British and French among others. The fractured debilitated kingdoms of India were gradually taken over by the Europeans and indirectly controlled by puppet rulers. By the 19th century, the British had assumed direct and indirect control over most of India.

The Portuguese were the first Europeans to arrive in India in 1498. The closing of traditional trade routes in western Asia by the Ottomans and rivalry with the Italian states set Portugal in search of an alternate sea route to India. The first successful voyage to India was by Vasco da Gama in 1498, when he arrived in Calicut, Kerala. He proceeded to Goa. The Portuguese established a chain of outposts along India's west coast and on the island of Sri Lanka in the early 16th century. Goa was their prized possession and, the seat of Portugal's viceroy who governed Portugal's empire in Asia. Portugal's northern province included settlements at Daman, Diu, Chaul, Baçaim, Salsette, and Mumbai. Mumbai was given to the British crown in 1661 as part of the dowry of Catherine of Braganza. The rest of the northern province, with the exception of Daman and Diu, was lost to the Marathas in the early 18th century. Dadra and Nagar Haveli was occupied in 1779. Dadra and Nagar Haveli was occupied by India in 1954, and Goa, Daman, and Diu were annexed to India in 1961.

Economic competition among the European nations led to the founding of commercial companies whose primary aim was to capture the spice trade by breaking the Portuguese monopoly in Asia. In England the East India Company, founded in 1600, in the Netherlands the United East India Company, founded in 1602 and in France the East India Company founded in 1664. Both companies managed to establish trading warehouses along the Indian coast. Indian rulers enthusiastically accommodated the newcomers in hopes of pitting them against the Portuguese.

English company agents became familiar with Indian customs and languages. In many ways, the English agents of that period lived like Indians, intermarried willingly, and a large number of them never returned to their home country. The knowledge of India thus acquired and the mutual ties forged with Indian trading groups gave the English a competitive edge over other Europeans. In 1619 Jahangir (Mghal ruler at the time) granted them permission to trade in his territories at Surat (in Gujarat) on the west coast and Hughli (in West Bengal) in the east. These and other locations on the peninsula became centers of international trade in spices, cotton, sugar, raw silk, saltpeter, calico, and indigo. In 1717 the Mughal emperor, Farrukh-siyar, gave the British--who by then had already established themselves in the south and the west--a grant of thirty-eight villages near Calcutta, acknowledging their importance to the continuity of international trade in the Bengal economy.

The British brought silver bullion and copper to pay for transactions, helping the smooth functioning of the Mughal revenue system and increasing the benefits to local artisans and traders. The fortified warehouses of the British brought extraterritorial status, which enabled them to administer their own civil and criminal laws and offered numerous employment opportunities as well as asylum to foreigners and Indians. The British factories successfully competed with their rivals as their size and population grew. The original clusters of fishing villages (Madras and Calcutta) or series of islands (Bombay) became headquarters of the British administrative zones. The British company employed sepoys (European-trained and European-led Indian soldiers) to protect its trade, but local rulers sought their services to settle scores in regional power struggles.

South India witnessed the first open confrontation between the British and the French, whose forces were led by Robert Clive and François Dupleix, respectively. Both companies desired to place their own candidate as the ruler of Arcot, the area around Madras. At the end of a protracted struggle between 1744 and 1763, when the Peace of Paris was signed, the British gained an upper hand over the French and installed their man in power, supporting him further with arms and lending large sums as well. The French and the British also backed different factions in the succession struggle for Mughal in Bengal, but Clive intervened successfully and defeated Nawab Siraj-ud-daula in the Battle of Plassey (Palashi, about 150 kilometers north of Calcutta) in 1757. Clive found help from a combination of vested interests that opposed the existing nawab: disgruntled soldiers, landholders, and influential merchants whose commercial profits were closely linked to British fortunes.

Later, Clive defeated the Mughal forces at Buxar (Baksar, west of Patna in Bihar) in 1765, and the Mughal emperor (Shah Alam, r. 1759-1806) conferred on the company administrative rights over Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa, a region of roughly 25 million people with annual revenue of 40 million rupees. The imperial grant virtually established the company as a sovereign power, and Clive became the first British governor of Bengal.

Denmark was the last of the colonial powers to set foot in India. They established trading outposts in Tranquebar, Tamil Nadu (1620), Serampore, West Bengal (1755) and the Nicobar Islands (1750's). At one time, the main Danish and Swedish East Asia companies together imported more tea to Europe than the British did. Their outposts lost economic and strategic importance, and Tranquebar, the last Danish outpost, was sold to the British in 1845. Austrian enterprises were set up in the 1720s on the vicinity of Surat in modern-day southeastern Gujarat. As with the other non-British enterprises, the Danish and Austrian enclaves were taken over by the British between 1765 and 1815.

Comments

Popular Posts

Effects of Colonization in India

Some people still have the illusion that the British Raj was not all that bad. But in reality is that the British Colonial rule as against the interests of the common people of the Indian sub-continent and it destroyed the education system, economy, ancient monuments and livelihood of the people. One can trace the education system in India to third century B.C. Ancient days, the sages and scholars imparted education orally. After the development of letters it took the form of writing. Palm leaves and bark of trees were used for education. Temples and community centers often took the role of schools. When Buddhism spread in India , education became available to everyone and this led to the establishment of some world famous educational institutions Nalanda, Vikramshila and Takshashila. These educational institutes in fact arose from the monasteries. History has taken special care to give Nalanda University , which flourished from the fifth to 13th century AD, full credit for its e...

Nature of Morality

Morality is a complex and multifaceted concept that has been explored by philosophers, theologians, and scientists for centuries. It explores the fundamental principles that guide our judgments of right and wrong. Philosophical Perspectives Objectivism : Moral principles are objective and exist independently of human opinion or culture. They are considered absolute truths.   Relativism : Morality is subjective and varies across cultures, individuals, and historical periods. There is no single, universal moral code.     Constructivism : Moral principles are created and shaped by human beings through social interactions and cultural practices.     Utilitarianism : Morally right action is one that maximizes happiness or pleasure and minimizes suffering. The focus is on the consequences of actions, rather than their intrinsic rightness or wrongness.     Deontology : Emphasizes duty and obligation. Certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of their consequences. The fo...

Laws of Behavior Change

The Four Laws of Behavior Change is from James Clear’s Atomic Habits. These laws form a sequential loop that helps to make new behaviors more likely to start, stick, and repeat. Atomic Habits offers practical, science-backed strategies for building good habits and breaking bad ones through small, compounding changes. Habits form through a four-step loop: cue (trigger), craving (motivation), response (action), reward (satisfaction). Habits can be optimized or inverted to build good habits or break bad ones Law 1 : Make it Obvious (Cue) triggers awareness by designing visible prompts in your environment or routines. This starts the cycle, as unnoticed cues lead to no action. Law 2 : Make it Attractive (Craving) builds motivation by linking the behavior to dopamine-boosting anticipation. It amplifies the cue’s pull, turning notice into desire. Law 3 : Make it Easy (Response) lowers friction so the action flows naturally from craving. This ensures the craving leads to actual perform...

The Pause Principle

The Pause Principle is the practice of intentionally stopping and reflecting before acting. Pausing is a deliberate and strategic act that enables clarity, awareness, and better choices. It is a simple concept with profound implications for leadership, learning, and life. In a world addicted to speed, the idea of slowing down can feel like a failure. We praise hustle. We reward reaction. We glorify multitasking and speed as if they were synonymous with effectiveness. But the best decisions, the most powerful conversations, and the most transformative moments don’t come from speeding up. The term was coined by Kevin Cashman, a leadership coach and author of The Pause Principle: Step Back to Lead Forward. The term captures the essence of a powerful paradox: slowing down can speed up your effectiveness. When we pause, we engage the prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain responsible for complex thinking, empathy, and decision-making. In contrast, reacting impulsively often activates t...

Meaning of Life - Eastern Philosophy

The meaning of life in Eastern philosophy emphasizes interconnectedness, balance, and the quest for spiritual enlightenment. Eastern traditions encourage inner peace, harmony with nature, and understanding of the self in relation to the universe. Hinduism: The Eternal Soul and Liberation In Hinduism, the meaning of life is deeply tied to the concept of the Atman (the soul) and its relationship with Brahman (the ultimate, unchanging reality). Life is seen as a cycle of birth, death, and rebirth known as samsara, and the goal is to escape this cycle through spiritual growth and realization of one's true nature. Hindus believe that each person’s purpose in life is to attain liberation from samsara (moksha). This liberation is achieved through self-realization, understanding that the individual soul (Atman) is one with the universal soul (Brahman). The journey involves meditation, devotion, ethical living, and seeking wisdom from sacred texts like the Bhagavad Gita. Life is a chan...

Rules for Living Well: An Eastern Perspective

The Eastern perspective on living well is gentle yet powerful. These teachings prioritize inner peace, balance, and alignment with the natural rhythms of existence. It’s an approach that shifts the focus from external achievements to internal balance. The paths of Buddhism, Taoism, Hinduism, and Confucianism have their distinct characteristics. Let us explore key principles from these traditions for living well. Embrace Impermanence In Buddhist philosophy, the concept of “anicca” or impermanence is a cornerstone of understanding suffering. We cling to pleasure, youth, and success. We resist pain, loss, and change. Our emotions, relationships, possessions, and even our lives are transient. Clinging to things as if they are permanent leads to suffering (dukkha). We must accept the change to live well. Think of a river. It is constantly moving, changing course, and evolving. Trying and holding onto a single drop of water is futile. Similarly, our lives are a continuous flow of experi...

The Backwards Law

The Backwards Law is the idea that the more you pursue or cling to something, the less likely you are to get it. Whether it’s happiness, love, success, or even sleep, the act of striving can feel like chasing a mirage. Conversely, when you let go of your desperate need for it, you often create the conditions for it to come to you naturally. It’s a counterintuitive principle rooted in the interplay of desire, resistance, and acceptance. We live in a world that constantly tells us to strive, to push harder, and to never give up on our goals. We are taught that success, happiness, and love are things to be pursued with relentless effort. What if the very act of chasing something is what pushes it further out of reach? It’s the counterintuitive idea that when you desperately want something, you are subconsciously signaling to yourself that you don’t have it, thus reinforcing a feeling of lack. This feeling of lack often leads to behaviors that are counterproductive to achieving your des...

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias where an initial positive impression of a person, company, brand, or product in one area influences your opinion or feelings in another area. It is like a halo that surrounds a positive attribute, making you perceive other qualities in a more favorable light.   Cognitive biases are systematic errors in thinking that can affect our perception, judgment, and decision-making. They are mental shortcuts that our brains take to simplify information processing, but they can sometimes lead to inaccurate or irrational conclusions. Examples of the Halo Effect: Physical attractiveness : Attractive people are often perceived as smarter, more competent, and more trustworthy.   Brand reputation : A well-known brand might be perceived as producing higher-quality products or offering better customer service. Celebrity endorsements : Celebrities can influence consumer choices based on their perceived positive qualities.   First impressions : A strong first ...

History of India - The British Raj

British India or British Raj is the term used to refer to the period of direct British imperial rule of the Indian Subcontinent which included the present-day India , Myanmar , Bangladesh and Pakistan from 1858 to 1947. Much of the territory under British control during this time was not directly ruled by the British, but was nominally independent Princely States which were directly under the rule of the Maharajas, Rajas, Thakurs and Nawabs who entered into treaties as sovereigns with the British monarch as their feudal superior. The British abolished the British East India Company and replaced it with direct rule under the British Crown in 1858. In proclaiming the new direct-rule policy to "the Princes, Chiefs, and Peoples of India", Queen Victoria promised equal treatment under British law, which never materialized. Many existing economic and revenue policies remained virtually unchanged under British Raj. But several administrative modifications were introduced...

Golden Mean

The golden mean is the idea that the best or most virtuous course lies between two extremes, one of excess and one of deficiency. It is associated with Aristotle’s ethics but also appears in other philosophical traditions. Aristotle’s golden mean is his idea that every moral virtue is a balanced state between two opposite vices: one of excess and one of deficiency. It is a practical guide for living well rather than a mathematical midpoint. Each virtue targets a ‘just right’ way of feeling and acting. Courage The virtue of courage is the mean between excessive fearlessness and excessive fear. A courageous person faces real dangers for good reasons but does not seek danger for its own sake. Temperance Temperance in pleasures lies between self‑indulgence and extreme abstinence. The temperate person enjoys pleasures in the right amount, at the right times, and for the right reasons, rather than either overindulging or denying all enjoyment. Generosity In everyday giving and sp...